-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IP clearance form #2
Conversation
</tr> | ||
</table> | ||
<p> | ||
Identify name recorded for software grant: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alamb I'm not clear on what should be provided here. I saw that for the object store donation there was an entry of Identify name recorded for software grant: Software Grant from InfluxData, Inc, recoded 2022-07-22
. Could you tell me more about the process you followed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we donated the object_store
crate initially to ASF, we also filled submitted a Software Grant: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#grants
When an individual or corporation decides to donate a body of existing software or documentation to one of the Apache projects, they need to execute a formal Software Grant Agreement (SGA) with the ASF. Typically, they do this after negotiating approval with the ASF Incubator or one of the PMCs, since the ASF does not accept software unless there is a viable community available to support it as part of a collaborative project.
We already have a vote to accept this software into the Arrow project by the Arrow PMC.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically, I think this form needs to be filled out https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant-template.pdf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(update: see discussion below)
<td>Remind active committers that they are responsible for | ||
ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is | ||
required to authorize their contributions under their | ||
individual CLA. | ||
</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sunchao, @viirya, @kazuyukitanimura, @huaxingao, @parthchandra, @comphead, @snmvaughan
Please be aware that active committers are responsible for ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is required to authorize their contributions under their individual CLA.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess that we don't need it as we don't require it for our other open source contributions. But I'm trying to make sure of it by asking the question internally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was told that we typically do OSS under ICLA only. This is what we did for Arrow and Spark etc. contributions.
If you are the only authors, and we have verified that all the authors have an ICLA on file, this is probably fine. I think the idea for the donation form is to ensure it is 100% clear that no corporation will try and assert ownership of the work being donated. Maybe there is something in the https://lists.apache.org/list.html?legal-discuss@apache.org archives about a similar situation, or if not we could ask there |
https://lists.apache.org/thread/11bqj3b5j4xsx58cyddfwntsq6jdlknk looks potentially related but not quite the same What I suggest is:
The authors listed on the 2b95ac4 are:
If this sounds reasonable to you, I would also be happy to write a note to legal-discuss to see what they say |
I actually did some digging digging in the archives -- I think the situation we are discussing here is covered by My understanding of those tickets is that making sure we have provenance (who wrote the code) and an assertion they have the legal right to donate the code is sufficient (e.g. I still believe #2 (comment) good advice) |
Thanks @alamb !
Yes, I can confirm these are the only authors of Comet.
At this point, all of us should have ICLA filed (most of us already are committers so have filed it long time back, except Kazuyuki and Steve who filed it recently). |
Yes, their ICLA confirmations were recently received by the ASF secretary |
I checked this morning and found that all contributors are either PMC members or committers of ASF projects or have recently filed ICLAs. |
Thanks @andygrove and @alamb ! Please let us know if you've got everything you need. Happy to provide any additional info required. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reviewed this document and I think looks good from my perspective
I believe @andygrove , being the chair of the Arrow project (and thus an officer) can double check ICLAs are on file https://whimsy.apache.org/ but I believe they are
I see we have already reminder the contributors of their obligations via #2 (comment) (it might be nice if they acknowledged this actively, but I don't think it is required)
So all in all I think we are good to go.
<li>It will be integrated into the Apache Arrow project in a new repository</li> | ||
</ul> | ||
<ul> | ||
<li>Officer or member managing donation: Andy Grove (Apache Arrow PMC Member)</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we mention you are chair this year as well?
students, teachers or child professionals, principals or program directors, schools or | ||
programs, and/or school districts or communities. | ||
|
||
<b>Comet ML, Inc. (CORPORATION; DELAWARE, USA)</b> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also looked at Comet / Comet ML and I agree they look fine to me: I do not think someone would be confused between "Apache Arrow Comet" and "Comet ML"
</tr> | ||
<tr> | ||
<td>2024-02-03</td> | ||
<td>Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅
</tr> | ||
</table> | ||
<p> | ||
Identify name recorded for software grant: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(update: see discussion below)
I submitted this to the incubator svn repo and started a vote. https://lists.apache.org/thread/lj3j4q7snpzrfo3mh3cph26mdpr2jrfx |
Thank you @alamb @andygrove ! |
"filter with string" test now passes
DO NOT MERGE
IP Clearance Form that will be pushed to incubator SVN once complete.